Home > Computing, Philosophy, Physics, Science > Afterthoughts on Observer-relativity…

Afterthoughts on Observer-relativity…

After today’s class I started to think more about this observer-relativity. According to the definition, something is observer-relative if it would not exist if minds did not exist. Or that the something COULD still exist (I think this version is more valid). But, what I was thinking about was: by the word “mind” are we speaking of “consciousness”? Or of the “brain”?

It has been argued that intelligence can exist independent of consciousness (as, for example, when we drive home without thinking about it). So, if for observer-relativity if we were to equate “mind” with “consciousness” we would be saying that we can still be intelligent without having a concept of semantics? (I’m assuming that consciousness is a prerequisite for semantic usage – or even syntactical awareness for that matter.) Furthermore, in the development of artificial intelligence – assuming we don’t need a conscious robot to produce intelligence – how can we expect the robot to grasp semantics? The artificial being would not have any sense of meaning – but only syntactical application.

This dualist sense of consciousness seems like a problem to me.

McDermott speaks of an objective computer, which seems to be a more monist approach to the issue of consciousness…


  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: